<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BEOWULF by Robert Zemeckis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moviereviewblog.net/2007/11/23/beowulf-by-robert-zemeckis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moviereviewblog.net/2007/11/23/beowulf-by-robert-zemeckis/</link>
	<description>itsvery Movie Review - independent film reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:04:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JoeOE18</title>
		<link>http://www.moviereviewblog.net/2007/11/23/beowulf-by-robert-zemeckis/comment-page-1/#comment-11607</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeOE18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moviereviewblog.net/2007/11/23/beowulf-by-robert-zemeckis/#comment-11607</guid>
		<description>I think if you&#039;d seen this in 3D (assuming you didn&#039;t) that you would have had a higher opinion of it. I would definitely agree that it&#039;s a 3 star movie, but in 3D all the set pieces and even just scenes of ordinary acting look more impressive - especially some of the climactic action sequences. 3D is not without it&#039;s imperfections, sometimes you could see echoes of the picture and it&#039;s more strain on the brain, but I just thought it was worth pointing out that there is a difference in entertainment value between the 3D and non-3D versions.

Joseph Ewens... (http://joyousfilm.blogspot.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if you&#8217;d seen this in 3D (assuming you didn&#8217;t) that you would have had a higher opinion of it. I would definitely agree that it&#8217;s a 3 star movie, but in 3D all the set pieces and even just scenes of ordinary acting look more impressive &#8211; especially some of the climactic action sequences. 3D is not without it&#8217;s imperfections, sometimes you could see echoes of the picture and it&#8217;s more strain on the brain, but I just thought it was worth pointing out that there is a difference in entertainment value between the 3D and non-3D versions.</p>
<p>Joseph Ewens&#8230; (<a href="http://joyousfilm.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://joyousfilm.blogspot.com</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
